Evaluation of remaining pericervical dentin thickness using various orifice shapers under CBCT – an in vitro study
Original Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56501/intjendorehab.2022.647Keywords:
Peri-cervical dentin, Orifice shaper, Hyflex CMAbstract
Aim
The aim of this study was to evaluate the remaining peri-cervical dentin thickness using various orifice shaper under Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
Materials and Methods
Forty-five freshly extracted mandibular first molars with root curvature between 20 ̊ - 35 ̊ were taken and divided into fifteen teeth per group as Group1- Gates-Glidden drills, Group 2- Hyflex CM and Group 3- ProTaper Universal orifice shaper SX. All the teeth were embedded into acrylic resin block. The working length of each specimen was taken with an apex locator and confirmed with a radiograph. Access cavity preparation were made, and the canals were located. The distal roots were cut 1mm below the furcation and initial root canal preparation was done. Pre-operative Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) imaging was done. Then 0.5mm axial cross section were obtained at 1mm distance. The measurements were done by taking the mean from labio-lingual diameter and mesio-distal diameter using image analysis. The orifice was enlarged according to the assigned groups Each orifice shaper was used 5 times and then replaced by a new one before taking post-operative CBCT.
Results
There was a statistically significant difference in GROUP 2: Hyflex as compared to GROUP 1: GG drills and GROUP 3: ProTaper Universal. Although there was no statistical difference between GROUP 1: GG drills and GROUP 3: ProTaper Universal.
Conclusion
The Hyflex orifice shapers resulted in preservation of more dentin than GG drills and ProTaper orifice shapers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Aishwarya R
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.