EVALUATION OF INTERALAR, INTER COMMISSURAL AND INTERCANTHAL DISTANCE IN DETERMINATION OF THE WIDTH OF MAXILLARY ANTERIORS TO AID IN ARTIFICIAL TEETH SELECTION IN SOUTH INDIAN POPULATION

Original research

Authors

  • Vijitha D Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Rajah Muthiah Dental College and Hospital, Chidambaram , Tamil Nadu India.
  • Madhumita S Consultant , Chidambaram
  • Srinivasan .P Professor & Head, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Rajah Muthiah Dental College and Hospital, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56501/intjesthresdent.2022.103

Keywords:

Artificial teeth selection, Facial measurements, Interalar distance, Intercanthal Distance, Inter commissural Distance

Abstract

Aim: To select a approximate sized maxillary anterior teeth continues to be a challenge during complete denture construction. Facial measurements which have been used for section of teeth has proved to have sexual and ethnic differences.

Objective: To establish a correlation between the different facial measurements with the total width of maxillary six anteriors in the South Indian population to aid in teeth selection.

Materials and Method: 170 adults (85 males and 85 females) were chosen for measurements. The Interalar distance, the Intercanthal distance, the Inter commissural distance, the combined width of four maxillary incisors and maxillary six anteriors were measured using a Boley gauge. Data analysis was done with student “t” test and the mean and standard deviation were calculated on the basis of gender. The Correlation Coefficient was calculated to evaluate the relationship between the selected Anthropometric variants and the combined width of four maxillary incisors and maxillary six anteriors.

Result: The obtained values found to show higher values in males compared to female subjects (p<0.01). A statistically significant correlation coefficient existed between the Interalar distance and the total width of four maxillary incisors and maxillary six anteriors in males. for the ICD, IAD tested, no statistical differences were observed between gender to IcoD (P<0.07).

Conclusion: The results suggests that gender variations exists and as correlation coefficients were relatively small the Interalar distance can be used one of the technique for choosing the maxillary anterior teeth width for South Indian males for fabrication of complete dentures.

References

Whener PJ, Hickey JC, Boucher CO. Selection of artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1967;18 :222-232.

McCord JF. Registration:Stage II – Selection of teeth. Br Dent J. 2000; 188: 660-666.

Khalid A. Al Wazzan. The relationship between intercanthal dimension and the widths of maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:608-612.

Smith BJ. The value of the nose width as an esthetic guide in Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1975;34:562-573.

Mavroskoufis F. Ritchie GM. Nasal width and incisive papilla as guides for the selection and arrangement of maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;45:592-597.

Scandrett FR, Kerber PE, Umrigar ZR. A clinical evaluation of techniques to determine the combined width of the maxillary anterior teeth and the maxillary central incisor. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;48:15-22.

Cesario VA Jr, Latta GH Jr. Relationship between the mesiodistal width of the maxillary central incisor and interpupillary distance. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52:641-643.

Hoffman W Jr, Bomberg TJ, Hatch RA. Interalar width as a guide in denture tooth selection. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:219-221.

Varjao FM. Intercommisural width in 4 racial groups as a guide for the selection of maxillary anterior teeth in complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2005 ;18 : 513- 515.

Mohammed Aleem Abdullah. Inner canthal distance and geometric progression as a predictor of maxillary central incisor width. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:16-20.

Latta.GH ,Weaver JR. The relationship between the width of the mouth interalar width, bizygomatic width, and Interpupillary distance in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 65: 250-254.

Vanderlei Luiz Gomes, Luiz Carlos Gonçalves. ,Interalar Distance to Estimate the Combined Width of the Six Maxillary Anterior Teeth in Oral Rehabilitation Treatment .J Esthet Restor Dent. 21:26–36, 2009.

Donald. H.Enlow. Facial Growth. 3rd Edition, 1990. W.B.Sunders Company.

Murphy KW, Laskin DM. Intercanthal and interpupillary distance in the black population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho. 1990;69:676-680.

Zakiah Mohd Isa, Omar Farouq Tawfiq. Regression methods to investigate the relationship between facial measurements and widths of the maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103:182-188.

Owens EG, Goodacre JC, Loh PL, Hanke G, Okamura M,.A multi-center interracial study of facial appearance. Part 2: a comparison of intraoral parameters. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15: 283-288.

Sterret JD, Oliver T, Robinson F, Fortson W, Knaak B, Russel CM. Width/length ratios of normal clinical crowns of the maxillary anterior dentition man. J Clin Periodontol. 1999;26:153-157.

Ufuk Hasanreisoglu. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: Facial and dental proportions. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:530-538.

Gillen RJ, Schwartz RS, Hilton TJ, Evans DB. An analysis of selected normative tooth proportions. Int J Prosthodont. 1994;7:410-417.

Kern BE. Anthropometric parameters of tooth selection. J Prosthet Dent. 1967;17:431-437.

Dharap AS, Tanuseputro H. A comparison of interalar width and intercanine distance in Malay males and females. Anthropol Anz. 1997 Mar;55 (1):63-8.

Keng SB. Nasal width dimensions and anterior teeth in prosthodontics. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1986 Jul;15(3):311-4.

Pisulkar S, Nimonkar S, Bansod A, Belkhode V, Godbole S. Quantifying the Selection of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Extraoral Anatomical Landmarks. Cureus. 2022 Jul 28;14(7).

Chander NG: Prudential analysis of methods in the selection of teeth for complete denture. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021, 21:215-6.

R: An analysis of the aesthetic proportions of anterior maxillary teeth in a UK population. Br Dent J. 2020, 228:449-55.

Wang Y, Song Y, Zhong Q, Xu C: Evaluation of influence factors on the width, length, and width to length ratio of the maxillary central incisor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021, 33:351-63. 10.1111/jerd.1260.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-28

How to Cite

Vijitha D, Madhumita S, & Srinivasan .P. (2022). EVALUATION OF INTERALAR, INTER COMMISSURAL AND INTERCANTHAL DISTANCE IN DETERMINATION OF THE WIDTH OF MAXILLARY ANTERIORS TO AID IN ARTIFICIAL TEETH SELECTION IN SOUTH INDIAN POPULATION: Original research. International Journal of Esthetics and Restorative Dentistry, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.56501/intjesthresdent.2022.103