Knowledge, Attitude and Practice regarding use of resin cements for indirect restoration amongst general dentist and specialist – A Survey

Survey

Authors

  • S Christy Private Practitioner, Karaikudi
  • M S Nivedhitha Professor, Department of Conservative dentsitry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha University, Velappanchavadi, Chennai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56501/intjesthresdent.2022.531

Keywords:

Knowledge, attitude and practice, total etch resin cements, self-etch resin cement, self-adhesive resin cement, resin cements

Abstract

Resin cements are also known as bonding cement. They exhibit adherence to the inner or intaglio face of the restoration and the interface of the tooth. Initially, the mode of earlier resin cement was generally a type of micro-mechanical form of adhesion mechanism. Currently, cements lute to tooth facet surface and to restorative interface by a chemical bond. It was observed that the resin cement exhibited more retention as compared to the conventional luting cement, primarily due to inherent high bond strengths, but the limitation were multiple steps, difficulty in cleaning up the clingy cement and being highly technique-sensitive luting agents. The self-adhesive resin cement does not need another bonding procedure. An understanding, knowledge and awareness of clinical performance of a luting agent system is imperative prior to selecting the material for the requisite clinical scenario. Since different types of materials like cast metal, base metal, gold alloys, porcelain-fused-to-metal, ceramic infiltrated materials, resin or composited based, and all-ceramic indirect restorative alternatives are available, hence, an ideal luting agent will have to match the inherent physical, mechanical, chemical, biological, and handling prerequisites like adequate and optimal working time, improved compressive strength, optimal flowability, negligible microleakage, devoid of solubility in saliva, adhesiveness, compatibility to the tooth and tissue, aesthetics, ease of manipulation and removal of excess.

References

Weiser F, BehrM. Self-Adhesive Resin Cements: A Clinical Review. J Prosthodont. 2014;24(2):100-8.

Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR and Ferrari M. Self-adhesive Resin Cements: A Literature Review. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10(4):251-8.

Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, NaumannM and Taschner M. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch?JAdhesDent. 2008;10(5):339-44.

Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien JA, Cenci MS, Moraes RR and Pereira-Cenci T. The Role of Resin Cement on Bond Strength of Glass-fiber Posts LutedInto Root Canals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of In Vitro Studies. Oper Dent. 2014;39(1):E31-44.

Attar N, Tam LE and McComb D. Mechanical and physical properties of contemporary dental luting agents. J Prosthet Dent.2003;89(2):127-34.

De Souza G, Braga RR, Cesar PF and Lopes GC. Correlation between clinical performance and degree of conversion of resin cements: a literature review. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015;23(4):358-68.

Horn HR. Porcelain laminate veneers bonded to etch enamel. Dent Clin North Am.1983;27(4):671–84.

McCabe JF, Walls AW. Applied dental materials, 9th edn. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 2008. pp 274-85.

Simon JF, Darnell LA. Consideration for proper selection of dental cements. CompendContinEduc Dent. 2012;33(1):28-30, 32, 34-5; quiz 36, 38.

Petropoulou A, Pantzari F, Nomikos N, Chronopoulos V and Kourtis S. The Use of Indirect Resin Composites in Clinical Practice: A Case Series. Dentistry. ISSN: 2161-1122.

Novais VR, RaposoLHA, ResendeR, Lopes C, Simamoto Junior PC and Soares CJ. Degree of conversion and bond strength of resin-cements to feldspathic ceramic using different curing modes. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25(1):61-8.

Rodrigues RB,de Lima E, Roscoe MG, Soares CJ, Cesar PF and Novais VR.Influenceof Resin Cements on Color Stability of Different Ceramic Systems.Braz Dent J. 2017; 28(2): 191-95.

Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81(2):135-41.

Hill EE. Dental Cements for Definitive Luting: A Review and Practical Clinical Considerations. Dent Clin N Am. 2007;51(3):643-58.

Dickens SH, Flaim GM and Takagi S. Mechanical properties and biochemical activity of remineralizing resin-based Ca–PO4 cements. Dent Mater. 2003;19(6):558-66.

Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials, 11th ed. St Louis:Mosby; 2002.p.594-634.

Sunico-Segarra M, Segarra A. A Practical Clinical Guide to Resin Cements. 2015.

Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, Kanjuparambil JP, Neumann K, Kiel-bassa AM. Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. IntEndod J. 2006;39:809-818

Ernst CP, Cohnen U, Stender E, Willershausen B. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93:551-558.

Federlin M, Krifka S, Herpich M, et al. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of ceramic thickness, preparation design and luting material on fracture resistance and marginal integrity in vitro. Oper Dent.2007;32:251-260.

Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, et al. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: Marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Dent Mater. 2007;May [Epub ahead of print].

Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM, et al. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96:104-14.

Escribano N, de la Macorra JC. Microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive luting cements to ceramic. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8:337-341.

Fabianelli A, Goracci C, Bertelli E, Monticelli F, Grandini S, Ferrari M. Invitro evaluation of wall-to-wall adaptation of a self-adhesive resin cement used for luting gold and ceramic inlays. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7:33-40.

Yang B, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M. Micro-tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin. Dent Mater. 2006;22:45-56.

Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H,Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004;83:454-458.

Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lam-brechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res. 2000;79:709-714.

Dehno SMS, Giti R, Kalantari MH, Mohammadi F (2022) The effects of provisional resin cements on the color and retentive strength of all-ceramic restorations cemented on customized zirconia abutments. PLoS ONE 17(1): e0262582.

Federlin M, Krifka S, Herpich M, et al. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of ceramic thickness, preparation design and luting material on fracture resistance and marginal integrity in vitro. Oper Dent. 2007;32:251-260.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-06

How to Cite

S Christy, & M S Nivedhitha. (2022). Knowledge, Attitude and Practice regarding use of resin cements for indirect restoration amongst general dentist and specialist – A Survey: Survey. International Journal of Esthetics and Restorative Dentistry, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.56501/intjesthresdent.2022.531