Effect Of Soft Start and Pulse Curing Modes of light emitting diodes on Postoperative Sensitivity after restoration of Cervical Abrasion with Composites - A Randomized Control Clinical Trial

Original research

Authors

  • Mahalakshmi Nandakumar Consultant Endodontist, Private Dental Practice, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56501/intjesthresdent.2022.664

Keywords:

Cervical Abrasion, Postoperative Sensitivity, Pulse LED Curing Mode, Polymerization Shrinkage, Soft Start LED Curing Mode

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative sensitivity is merely a clinical manifestation of polymerization shrinkage that occurs within the composite -tooth interface. The slower rate of polymerization using slow curing models like soft start and pulse mode leads to improved ingress of the molecules in the restorative material, thus exponentially decreasing the polymerization shrinkage stress in a restoration.
Aim: To compare the effect of different Light emitting mode (LED) of curing like Soft start and pulse modes on the postoperative sensitivity after restoration of cervical abrasion with composite.
Materials and Method: All the patients were selected according to the inclusion criteria and divided into 2 groups. The sample size calculation suggested 20 cases for each individual group. The lesion was prepared by acid etching and applying bonding agent and curing it. Composite restoration was placed using incremental technique and each increment was cured accordingly, group A - soft start mode and group B - pulse mode. The patients were recalled after 1 week and 1 month to assess the postoperative sensitivity.
Result: There was no difference which was statistically significant between soft start and pulse led curing mode group as far as the postoperative sensitivity was assessed.
Conclusion: Restorations which were cured with soft start curing method did not exhibit significant difference in incidence of postoperative sensitivity when compared to pulse curing technique.

References

Letzel H et al. Survival rates and reasons for failure of composite restoration in a multicentre clinical trial. J Dent. 1989; 17 Suppl 1:S10-7; discussion S26-8.

Stangel I, Barolet RY. Clinical evaluation of two posterior composite resins: two-year results. J Oral Rehabil. 1990 May; 17(3):257-68.

Anusavice KJ: Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials (ed 11). St Louis, Elsevier, 2003,pp.486-489.

Braga RR, Ballester RY, Ferracane JL. Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2005 Oct; 21(10):962-70.

Denise Sá Maia Cassellia/Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins. Postoperative Sensitivity in Class I Composite Resin Restorations in vivo. J Adhes Dent. 2006; 8(1): 53-58.

Christensen GJ. Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in class I, II and V restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002 Feb;133(2):229-31.

Feilzer AJ, Door LH, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci. 1995 Oct;103(5):322-6.

Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Bambi C, Grandini R. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 Sep 1;7(4):79-88.

Sobral MAP, Garone-Netto N, Luz M, Santos AP. Prevention of postoperative tooth sensitivity: A preliminary clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(9):661-8.

Ferracane JL. Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Dent Mater. 2005 Jan;21(1):36-42.

Baracco B, Perdigao J, Cabrera E, Giraldez I, & Ceballos. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: One-year results. Oper Dent. 2012;37(2):117-29.

Chan DC, Browning WD, Frazier KB, Brackett MG. Clinical evaluation of the soft-start (pulse-delay) polymerization technique in Class 1st and 2nd composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2008; 33(3):265-71.

Senthil Kumar S, Chacko Y, Lakshminarayanan L. Microleakage in posterior resin composite restoration using different filling, curing and polishing techniques. J Conserv Dent. 2005 Jan 1; 8 (1):52.

Umer F, Khan FR. Postoperative sensitivity in Class V composite restorations: Comparing soft start vs. constant curing modes of LED. J Conserv Dent. 2011 Jan;14(1):76-9.

Alomari Q, Omar R, Akpata E. Effect of LED curing modes on postoperative sensitivity after Class II resin composite restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2007 Oct 1; 9(5):477.

Watts DC, Al Hindi A. Intrinsic ‘soft-start’polymerisation shrinkage-kinetics in an acrylate-based resin-composite. Dent Mater. 1999 Jan 1;15(1):39-45.

Naito T. Postoperative sensitivity in posterior composite restorations is relevant in class 2nd cavities. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2008;8(4):225-6.

Yazici AR, Celik C, Dayangac B, Ozgunaltay G. Effects of different light curing units/modes on the microleakage of flowable composite resins. Eur J Dent. 2008 Oct;2(04):240-6.

Hujoel PP, Loesche WJ. Efficiency of split mouth designs. J Clin Periodontol. 1990;17(10):722-8.

Opdam NJ, Feilzer AJ, Roeters JJ, Smale I. Class 1st occlusal composite resin restorations: In vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage. Am J Dent. 1998;11(5):229-34.

Summit JB. Fundamentals of operative dentistry: A contemporary approach. Chicago: Quintessence Publication; 2006. p. 289-339. 4.

Jain P, Pershing A. Depth of cure and microleakage with high-intensity and ramped resin-based composite curing lights. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(9):1215-23.

El-Damanhoury H M, Platt J A. Polymerisation shrinkage stress kinetics and related properties of bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent. 2014;39(4):374-82.

Han SH, Sadr A, Tagami J, Park SH. Internal adaptation of resin composites at two configurations: Influence of polymerization shrinkage and stress. Dent Mater. 2016;32(9):1085-1094.

Ritter AV. Sturdevant's art & science of operative dentistry-e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017 Dec 20.

Sidhu P, Sultan OS, Math SY, Ab Malik N, Wilson NH, Lynch CD, Blum IR, Daood U. Current and future trends in the teaching of direct posterior resin composites in Malaysian dental schools: A cross-sectional study. J Dent. 2021 Jul 1;110:103683.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-21

How to Cite

Mahalakshmi Nandakumar. (2022). Effect Of Soft Start and Pulse Curing Modes of light emitting diodes on Postoperative Sensitivity after restoration of Cervical Abrasion with Composites - A Randomized Control Clinical Trial: Original research. International Journal of Esthetics and Restorative Dentistry, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.56501/intjesthresdent.2022.664