Rivaling efficacy of special stains in the identification of Barr bodies
Original Article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56501/intjforensicodontol.v8i1.794Keywords:
Barr Body, Sex, Gender, Feulgen, Giemsa, Forensic OdontologyAbstract
Background:
Gender determination becomes the first priority in process of identification of a person by a forensic investigator in case of mass disaster, crime investigations, and ethnic studies. Demonstration of nuclear sex plays a vital role in determining the gender of an individual. Barr bodies (BB) are known to arise from the inactivation of the X chromosome in a female somatic cell. They are basophilic structures with varying morphology measuring approximately 0.8 × 1.1 microns in the nucleus during interphase. Various nuclear stains such as Thionine, Papanicolaou, Feulgen, Cresyl-violet, Giemsa, Aceto-orcein, and acridine orange & Routine stains can validate Barr bodies.
Aim
To evaluate the efficacy of Feulgen, Giemsa, and H&E stains in the demonstration of Barr bodies.
Materials And Method
Buccal smears were prepared from 25 males & 25 females. These smears were stained by Feulgen, Giemsa & Routine staining methods. The Barr body identification was determined by the presence of a darkly stained condensed area on nucleoplasm. The frequency of Barr body was examined by observing 100 nuclei per smear under a binocular light microscope at 100 magnification. For all BB-positive cases, Barr Body Index(BBI) was calculated and compared for the different stains used.
Result
Buccal cytological smears stained with Feulgen, Giemsa, and Routine stains. Samples with a presence of Barr bodies ≤2 were recorded as male and those with >2 were recorded as female under microscopic findings. The percentage of Barr bodies in Feulgen-stained slides ranged from 30.2 - 37.9 among females and 0 - 0.1 in males, Giemsa slides ranged 14.2 - 22.2 from among females and 0 - 0.3 in males, while with Routine stained slides ranges recorded were10.2 - 14.9 in females and 0 - 0.5 in males. The sensitivity of Feulgen, Giemsa, and Routine stain for detecting sex accurately was 100% and specificity was 100%, 98%, and 94% respectively.
Conclusion
Feulgen stain proved to be better than Giemsa and routine stain for visualizing Barr Bodies.
References
Monali C, Pritam P, Tapan M, Kajal D. Gender determination: A view of forensic odontologist. Indian J Forensic Med Pathol. 2011 Oct;4(4):1-5.
Mittal T, Saralaya KM, Kuruvilla A, Achary C. Sex determination from buccal mucosa scrapes International journal of legal medicine. 2009 Sep;123:437-40.
Htun KS, Tuu N, Aung YL, Zaw T, Hlaing TM. Gender determination from barr bodies using giemsa and methylene blue stains in buccal mucosal smears.
Kaur N, Sidhu R, Chandra S, Taneja N. Buccal Barr bodies: Accuracy and reliability in sex determination. Saudi J Oral Dent Res. 2017;2:168-73.
Dr. Poojitha Ram V , Dr B R Yelikar , Dr Anil Reddy K Comparative study of efficacy of papanicolaou and aceto-orcein stains in demonstrating barr bodies in buccal mucosal smears 11 March 2021
Thomas P, Hecker J, Faunt J, Fenech M. Buccal micronucleus cytome biomarkers may be associated with Alzheimer's disease. Mutagenesis. 2007 Nov 1;22(6):371-9.
Joshi PS, Manasi S. Cytomorphometric analysis of oral premalignant and malignant lesions using feulgen stain and exfoliative brush cytology. Journal of Interdisciplinary Histopathology. 2013 Feb 17;1(4):204-11.
Khandelwal S, Solomon MC. Cytomorphological analysis of keratinocytes in oral smears from tobacco users and oral squamous cell carcinoma lesions—A histochemical approach. International journal of oral science. 2010 Mar;2(1):45-52.
Khanna KS. Efficacy of sex determination from human dental pulp tissue and its reliability as a tool in forensic dentistry. Journal of international oral health: JIOH. 2015;7(Suppl 2):10.
Ekanem VJ, Chris-Ozoko LE, Abade PO. Cytological determination of condensed sex chromatin body in buccal smear and peripheral blood film using various nuclear staining techniques. Annals of Tropical Pathology. 2012 Dec 1;3(2):133.
Balderman S, Lichtman MA. A history of the discovery of random x chromosome inactivation in the human female and its significance. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2011 Jul 31;2(3):e0058. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10058. PMID: 23908816; PMCID: PMC3678792.
Pathak BS, Pathak N, Govind BP. Characterization of validity and reliability of may grunwald-giemsa, carbol fuchsin and van geison stain in determination of barr bodies in buccal mucosal smears. International Journal of Forensic Odontology. 2022 Jun 24;7(1):58-64.
Archana T, Bashamalla R, Rao GV, Sravya T, Sivaranjani Y, Kiran MJ. Cytological assessment of Barr body in buccal scrapes: A comparative study. Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section). 2017 Mar 1;31(1):9-13.
Gurley AM, Hidvegi DF, Bacus JW, Bacus SS. Comparison of the Papanicolaou and Feulgen staining methods for DNA quantification by image analysis. Cytometry: The Journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology. 1990;11(4):468-74.
Davis AM, Herrmann W. The determination of chromosomal sex by oral smears. Yale J Biol Med. 1956;29:69–74.
Ravishankar A, Jaganathan N, Jain AR. Barr bodies in pulpal tissue as a diagnostic tool for gender determination. Drug Invention Today. 2018 Apr 1;10(4).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Deepali Kulkarni, Mandakini Mandale, Jyoti Bhavthankar, Jayanti Humbe, Vaishali Nandkhedkar, Savita Wagh, Poonam Zanwar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
