Awareness of Digital Imaging/Telepathology Among Dental Post Graduate Students: A Survey Survey

Main Article Content

Sangamithra.S
Gheena.S
Pratibha Ramani
Abilasha.R
Reshma Poothakulath Krishnan

Abstract

Background:


The collection, storage and sharing of pathological data among oral pathologists to this day is done mostly by physical transfer of slides and reports. Telepathology is a form of communication between medical professionals that includes the transmission of pathology images or testing data.


Aim:


The aim of the study is to assess the knowledge, attitude and perception of digital pathology/telepathology among dental post graduate students.


Materials and Methods:


A cross-sectional study consisting of a self constructed survey was distributed through an online portal to dental post graduate students. The survey focused on the type of respondent, knowledge of microscopic digital photography, current usage, strengths and weaknesses and perceived future direction of digital imaging in the pathology laboratory.


Results:


A total of 102 responses were collected. The overall response rate was 100%. 56.9% of dental post graduate students are aware of the term “Digital Pathology” or “Telepathology”. 11.8% of dental post graduate students use digital pathology in their routine practice.  20.6 % of dental post graduate students send specimens once a year. 75.5% of dental post graduate students believe that “Digital Pathology/Telepathology” can be effective for research purposes.  62.7% of dental post graduate students believe that digital pathology imaging provides faster diagnosis.  75.5% of dental post graduate students believe that digital pathology imaging has high equipment cost.  Comparison between the age of the respondents and their awareness of the term Digital Imaging/Telepathology and its scope in India stated that dental post graduate students of age group between 21-30 years were aware of the term and believed it has scope in India, but the results were insignificant (p>0.05).


Conclusion:


Improved knowledge and acceptance of digital pathology and telepathology throughout the dentistry community could facilitate the communication and cooperation necessary to realize the type of initiatives capable of advancing the importance of pathologists in the changing healthcare environment.


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Sangamithra.S, Gheena.S, Pratibha Ramani, Abilasha.R, & Reshma Poothakulath Krishnan. (2023). Awareness of Digital Imaging/Telepathology Among Dental Post Graduate Students: A Survey: Survey . International Journal of Head and Neck Pathology, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.56501/intjheadneckpathol.v6i1.714
Section
Articles

References

Ghaznavi F, Evans A, Madabhushi A, Feldman M. Digital imaging in pathology: whole-slide imaging and beyond. Annu Rev Pathol. 2013;8: 331–359.

Leong AS-Y, James CL, Thomas AC. Handbook of Surgical Pathology. Saunders; 1996.

Leong AS, Visinoni F, Visinoni C, Milios J. An advanced digital image-capture computer system for gross specimens: a substitute for gross description. Pathology. 2000;32: 131–135.

Pantanowitz L. Digital images and the future of digital pathology. J Pathol Inform. 2010;1. doi:10.4103/2153-3539.68332

Louis DN, Gerber GK, Baron JM, Bry L, Dighe AS, Getz G, et al. Computational pathology: an emerging definition. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138: 1133–1138.

Evans A, Krupinski E, Pantanowitz L, Weinstein R. 2014 American Telemedicine Association clinical guidelines for telepathology: Another important step in support of increased adoption of telepathology for patient care. Journal of Pathology Informatics. 2015. p. 13. doi:10.4103/2153-3539.153906

Pantanowitz L, Szymas J, Wilbur D, Yagi Y. Whole slide imaging for educational purposes. Journal of Pathology Informatics. 2012. p. 46. doi:10.4103/2153-3539.104908

Hedvat CV. Digital Microscopy: Past, Present, and Future. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2010. pp. 1666–1670. doi:10.5858/2009-0579-rar1.1

Bellis M, Metias S, Naugler C, Pollett A, Jothy S, Yousef GM. Digital pathology: Attitudes and practices in the Canadian pathology community. J Pathol Inform. 2013;4: 3.

Cucoranu I, Parwani A, West A, Romero-Lauro G, Nauman K, Carter A, et al. Privacy and security of patient data in the pathology laboratory. Journal of Pathology Informatics. 2013. p. 4. doi:10.4103/2153-3539.108542

Sinard JH, Powell SZ, Karcher DS. Pathology Training in Informatics: Evolving to Meet a Growing Need. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2014. pp. 505–511. doi:10.5858/arpa.2013-0328-ra

Kim JY, Gudewicz TM, Dighe AS, Gilbertson JR. The pathology informatics curriculum wiki: Harnessing the power of user-generated content. J Pathol Inform. 2010;1. doi:10.4103/2153-3539.65428

Harrison JH Jr, Stewart J 3rd. Training in pathology informatics: implementation at the University of Pittsburgh. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127: 1019–1025.

Stoopack JC. Biopsy techniques in oral surgery. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1952. pp. 1034–1046. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(52)90206-5