A Comparative Evaluation Of The Shear Bond Strength Of Two Different Orthodontic Bonding Agents On Artificial Crown Surfaces: An Invitro Study Original Research

Main Article Content

Priyanka Polineti
Anoosha Manda
Pradeep Kandikatla
C.V Padma Priya
Praveen Kumar Varma Datla
Tivanani Venkata Durga Mahendra
Velagala Sai Keerthi

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Bonding of buccal tubes to the tooth is an essential procedure in orthodontic treatment. With the increase in the number of adult patients seeking fixed orthodontic treatment, there is a need to find a more reliable procedure to bond the artificial crown surface. Successful orthodontic treatment requires sufficiently high and durable bond between buccal tubes and ceramic/zirconia surfaces. There is a need for a bonding agent which can provide maximum bond strength to all surfaces. This study aimed to assess and compare the shear bond strength and adhesive remnants of orthodontic buccal tubes to natural teeth, ceramic crowns and zirconia crowns using two different bonding systems.


METHODS: In this in vitro study, 60 extracted human molar teeth were randomly assigned to three groups (n=20) and then divided into two subgroups(n=10). Bonding of buccal tubes to enamel, ceramic and zirconia surfaces was done using Assure plus universal bonding resin and Enhance LC. The shear bond strength of buccal tubes to the enamel, ceramic and zirconia surfaces were determined by universal testing machine. The SBSs and ARI scores were statistically analysed with and Kruskal Wallis test.


RESULTS: The mean shear bond strength of buccal tubes to enamel, ceramic and zirconia surfaces bonded with Assure plus and Enhance LC was highest for enamel followed by zirconia surfaces respectively. Non-parametric Kruskal-Walli’s test found significant differences regarding the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI).


CONCLUSION: Bonding of buccal tubes to enamel, zirconia, and ceramic surfaces with Assure universal bonding resin and Enhance LC provided adequate bond strength. Thus, it may be used for bonding of orthodontic buccal tubes to the artificial crown surfaces in the clinical setting.

Article Details

How to Cite
Polineti, P., Manda, A., Kandikatla, P., C.V, P. priya, Datla, P. K. V., Tivanani, V. D. M., & Velagala, S. K. (2023). A Comparative Evaluation Of The Shear Bond Strength Of Two Different Orthodontic Bonding Agents On Artificial Crown Surfaces: An Invitro Study: Original Research. International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation, 14(2), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.56501/intjorthodrehabil.v14i2.781
Section
Articles

References

Singh S, Raghav P, Gaur A, Reddy M, Mishra V. Bonding to a porcelain surface: factors affecting the shear bond strength. APOS Trends Orthod. 2013; 3(5):152-6.

Coreil MN, McInnes-Ledoux P, Ledoux WR, Weinberg R. Shear bond strength of four orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990; 97(2):126-9.

Lowder PD, Foley T, Banting DW. Bond strength of 4 orthodontic adhesives used with a caries-protective resin sealant. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008; 134(2):291-5.

Albaladejo A, Montero J, Gómez de Diego R, López-Valverde A. Effect of adhesive application prior to bracket bonding with flowable composites. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(4):716-20.

Ayar MK. A review of ethanol wet-bonding: Principles and techniques. Eur J Dent. 2016 Jan;10(01):155-9.

Toodehzaeim MH, Haerian A, Safari I, Arjmandi R. The effect of assure plus resin on the shear bond strength of metal brackets bonded to enamel and surface of porcelain and amalgam restorations. Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications. 2017 Apr1;10(2):82-7.

Rosella D, Rosella G, Brauner E, Papi P, Piccoli L, Pompa G. A tooth preparation technique in fixed prosthodontics for students and neophyte dentists. Annali di stomatologia. 2015 Jul;6(3-4):104.

Griffin JD. Combining monolithic zirconia crowns, digital impressioning, and regenerative cement for a predictable restorative alternative to PFM. Compendium. 2013 Mar;34(3).

Yassaei S, Aghili HA, Davari A, Mostafavi SM. Effect of four methods of surface treatment on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to zirconium. J Dent(Tehran, Iran). 2015 Apr;12(4):281.

Purmal K, Alam MK, Sukumaran P. Shear bond strength of orthodontic buccal tubes to porcelain. Dent Res J. 2013 Jan;10(1):81.

Bowen RL, Marjenhoff WA. Development of an adhesive bonding system. Oper Dent 1992; 1:75-80.

Lai C, Bush PJ, Warunek S, Covell Jr DA, Al-Jewair T. An in vitro comparison of ultraviolet versus white light in the detection of adhesive remnants during orthodontic debonding. The Angle Orthod. 2019 May;89(3):438-45.

Eslami Amirabadi G, Shirazi M, Shirazi Z. Effect of saliva contamination on shear bond strength of Transbond XT and assure universal bonding resin to enamel. Journal of Islamic Dental Association of IRAN. 2014; 26(3):163-9.

Littlewood SJ, Mitchell L, Greenwood DC, Bubb NL, Wood DJ. Investigation of a hydrophilic primer for orthodontic bonding: an in vitro study. J Orthod. 2000 Jun;27(2):181-6.

Naseh R, Afshari M, Shafiei F, Rahnamoon N. Shear bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces using a universal bonding resin. Dent. 2018; 10(8):e739.

Reddy SM, Vijitha D, Deepak T, Balasubramanian R, Satish A. Evaluation of shear bond strength of zirconia bonded to dentin after various surface treatments of zirconia. Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2014 Mar;14(1):38-41.

Douara, Y., Abdul Kader, S., Kassem, H., & Mowafy, M. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to glazed monolithic zirconia using different bonding protocols. Egyptian Orthodontic Journal. 2019; 56(12), 9–20.

Lee JY, Kim JS, Hwang CJ. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using various zirconia primers. Korean J Orthod. 2015 Jul;45(4):164-70.

Kwak JY, Jung HK, Choi IK, Kwon TY. Orthodontic bracket bonding to glazed full-contour zirconia. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2016 May 1;41(2):106-13.

Gillis I, Redlich M. The effect of different porcelain conditioning techniques on shear bond strength of stainless-steel brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998;114(4):387- 92

Jedrychowski JR, Caputo AA, Foliart R. Effects of adhesion promoters on resin-enamel retention. J Dent Res. 1979; 58(4):1371-6.

Vamsilatha K, Venkata KM, Aileni KR, Sashidhar NR. Efficacy of new adhesion promoters on compromised hypocalcified enamel. J Clin Diag Res JCDR. 2015; 9(7): ZC09.

Vicente A, Bravo LA, Romero M, Ortíz AJ, Canteras M. Bond strength of brackets bonded with an adhesion promoter. Br J Orthod. 2004;196(8):482-5.

Chung CH, Fadem BW, Levitt HL, Mante FK. Effects of two adhesion boosters on the shear bond strength of new and rebonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2000 1; 118(3):295-9.

Major PW, Koehler JR, Manning KE. 24-hour shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain using various adhesion promoters. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995; 108(3):322-9.