Comparative Evaluation Of Bond Failure Rate Of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded With Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement And Composite- A Randomized Control Trial Original Research
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction:
Successful orthodontic treatment depends on the adhesive used for bonding orthodontic brackets and patient cooperation. Resin based adhesives are conventionally used but have drawbacks like white spot lesions and technique sensitivity. To overcome these problems, Resin modified glass ionomer cements (RMGIC) were introduced to utilise the fluoride releasing characteristic of GIC.
Aim:
To compare and evaluate bond failure rate and type of bond failure between brackets bonded with RMGIC and composite.
Materials and methods:
25 patients undergoing orthodontic treatment were included and evaluated for 6 months. Bonding was done with RMGIC and composite. Patients were recalled every month and bond failure rate and type of bond failure was evaluated.
Results:
A total of 526 teeth were bonded out of which 263 were bonded with RMGIC and 263 with composite. Statistical analysis was done with Chi-square test (p>0.05). Maximum debonding was seen in RMGIC group (6.46%) compared to composite (3.42%). Maximum debonding was seen in 1st molars bonded with RMGIC (35.3%). Majority bond failure type observed was Adhesive enamel failure in brackets bonded with RMGIC.
Conclusion:
From the study, it can be concluded that bond failure was commonly seen in RMGIC group in comparison with composite group. Adhesive enamel failure was the most commonly seen bracket failure type. RMGIC had majority bracket failure but within acceptable range and hence can be used as a substitute adhesive for bonding.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Bishara SE, VonWald L, Olsen ME, Laffoon JF. Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;16:616-620.
Tahir A, Ulfat B, Khan HA. Comparison of bracket retention of a resin modified glass ionomer cement and a resin based adhesive. Pak Orthod J. 2018; 10:82-86.
Zimmer, Bernd & Rottwinkel, Yvonne. Assessing patient-specific decalcification risk in fixed orthodontic treatment and its impact on prophylactic procedures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2004; 126. 318-24.
Benson PE, Alexander JA, Cotter S, Dyer F, Fenesha F, Patel A, Campbell C, Crowley N, and Millett TD. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement vs composite for orthodontic bonding: A multicentre, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;155:10-8.)
Komori A, Ishikawa H. The effect of delayed light exposure on bond strength: light cured resin reinforced glass ionomer cement vs light cured resin. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;P134-145.
Fan XC & Chen L. Effects of enamel surface preparation on bonding strength of resin modified glass ionomer cement: an in vitro study. J Adhesion Sci Tech. 2017;31:2017-2017.
Valente MR, Rijk GW, Drummond LJ and Evans AC. Etching conditions for resin modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:516-520.
Shaik JA, Reddy RK, Bhagyalakshmi K, Shah MJ, Madhavi O, Ramesh SV. In vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Different Adhesives. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9:289-292.
Cheng YH, Chen HC, Chuan LL, Tsai HH, Chou HT and Wang NW. Bond strength of orthodontic light cured resin modified glass ionomer cement. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:180-184.
Antonucci JM, McKinney JE, Stansbury JW. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement. US patent application.1988;856:117-160.
Hassan ZM, Bjorn G, Morten S. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of resin reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27:477-83.
Rix D, Foley TF, Mamandras A. Comparison of bond strength of three. adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:36-42.
Bishara SE, Vonwald L, Olsen ME, Laffoon JF, Jakobsen JR. Effect of light curing time on the initial shear bond strength of a glass ionomer adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:164-168.
Zhang L, Tang T, Zhang Z, Liang B, Wang X, Fu B. Improvement of enamel bond strengths for conventional and resin modified glass ionomers: acid etching vs. conditioning. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013;14:1013-1024.
Reicheneder, C.A, Gedrange T, Lange A, Baumert U & Proff P. Shear and tensile bond strength comparison of various contemporary orthodontic adhesive systems: An in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135. 422.e1-422.e6.
Decalcification and bond failure rate in resin modified glass ionomer cement versus conventional composite for orthodontic bonding: A systematic review & meta-analysis. Khan AR, Fida M, Gul M. Int Orthod. 2020;18:32-40.