Preference of restorative materials for class II caries among dentists in mandibular first primary molars among preschool children– A retrospective study Original Research

Main Article Content

Shahzan Shoaib
Revathi

Abstract

Background: Dental caries is an infectious microbiologic disease of the teeth that dissolves and destroy calcified tissue locally especially the proximal surface of posterior teeth in young children.


Aim: To find out the preference of the restorative material selection for children aged 4 to 6 years of age


Materials and methods: A total of 47 children aged 4-6 years visiting the hospital were assessed retrospectively and clinical findings were assessed, analyzed between June 2019 to March 2020. The data was then entered and tabulated in Microsoft Excel. The data was analyzed with the help of SPSS software 2024.


Results: In this study, we observed that glass ionomer cement was the most used restorative material in 4 to 6 years old children however composite restorative material was the most used restorative material in 5 years old. The prevalence of class II caries was observed to be higher in 6-year-old children.


Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, glass ionomer cement was the most used restorative material in 1st primary mandibular molar in 4 to 6-year-old children


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Shoaib, S., & Revathi. (2024). Preference of restorative materials for class II caries among dentists in mandibular first primary molars among preschool children– A retrospective study: Original Research . International Journal of Pedodontic Rehabilitation, 9(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.56501/intjpedorehab.v9i1.1018
Section
Articles

References

Patel MC, Bhatt RK, Khurana SM, et al. Choice of material for the treatment of proximal lesions in deciduous molars among paediatric post-graduates and paediatric dentists of Gujarat: A cross-sectional study. Advances in Human Biology 2019; 9: 258.

Masumo R, Bardsen A, Mashoto K, et al. Prevalence and socio-behavioral influence of early childhood caries, ECC, and feeding habits among 6-36 months old children in Uganda and Tanzania. BMC Oral Health 2012; 12: 24.

Masumo RM, Ndekero TS, Carneiro LC. Prevalence of dental caries in deciduous teeth and oral health related quality of life among preschool children aged 4–6 years in Kisarawe, Tanzania. BMC Oral Health 2020; 20: 46.

Anil S, Anand PS. Early Childhood Caries: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Prevention. Front Pediatr 2017; 5: 157.

Jain M, Namdev R, Bodh M, et al. Social and Behavioral Determinants for Early Childhood Caries among Preschool Children in India. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2015; 9: 115–120.

Ganesh A, Muthu MS, Mohan A, et al. Prevalence of Early Childhood Caries in India - A Systematic Review. Indian J Pediatr 2019; 86: 276–286.

Janakiram C, Antony B, Joseph J, Ramanarayanan V. Prevalence of Dental Caries in India among the WHO Index Age Groups: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research. 2018 Aug 1;12(8).

Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, et al. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130: 1459–1466.

Fuks AB, Ram D, Eidelman E. Clinical performance of esthetic posterior crowns in primary molars: a pilot study. Pediatr Dent 1999; 21: 445–448.

Mathur S, Jaiswal JN, Tripathi AM, Saha S, Palit M. Restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry. Int J Oral Health Med Res. 2016;2(6):101-6.

Croll TP, Nicholson JW. Glass ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 423–429.

Cameron AC, Widmer RP. Handbook of Pediatric Dentistry E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2013.

Milsom KM, Tickle M, Blinkhorn A. The prescription and relative outcomes of different materials used in general dental practice in the north west region of England to restore the primary dentition. J Dent 2002; 30: 77–82.

Welbury RR, Shaw AJ, Murray JJ, et al. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months. Br Dent J 2000; 189: 93–97.

Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, et al. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1387–1396.

Uhlen MM, Tseveenjav B, Wuollet E, et al. Stainless-steel crowns in children: Norwegian and Finnish dentists’ knowledge, practice and challenges. BMC Oral Health; 21. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01556-6.

Hes KMY, Leung SK, Wei SHY. Resin-ionomer restorative materials for children: A review. Australian Dental Journal 1999; 44: 1–11.

Burke FJT, Fleming GJP, Owen FJ, et al. Materials for restoration of primary teeth: 2. Glass ionomer derivatives and compomers. Dent Update 2002; 29: 10–4, 16–7.

Seale NS. The use of stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 501–505.

Burgess JO, Walker R, Davidson JM. Posterior resin-based composite: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 465–479.

Forss H, Widström E. From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland. Acta Odontol Scand 2001; 59: 57–62.