Clinical Evaluation of Zirconia and Stainless-Steel crowns in Primary Molars - A Randomized Control Trial Original Research
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim:
Aesthetic alternatives to stainless steel crown for restoring primary molars attain a growing interest. The aim of the study was clinical evaluation and comparison of zirconia and stainless steel crown in primary molars (clinical and radiograph)
Methods:
A randomized controlled study was conducted on children of age group of 5 to 8 years of age visiting, KVG Dental College and Hospital, Sullia and who were meet the inclusion criteria of the study. The study population was randomly divided into two groups of 24 each. Group I: stainless steel crown, Group II: zirconia crown. Post endodontic tooth preparation was done and selected stainless steel and zirconia crowns followed by cemented using type 1 glass ionomer cement. The subjects was be recalled after 3, 6 and 9 months to check gingival index, oral hygiene index and bone health of the tooth using intraoral periapical radiograph.
Results:
There was significant increase in score of gingival index and OHI score for both SSC and zirconia crowns after 3 month followed by reduction in score at 6 and 9 months. There was no statistically significant difference in alveolar bone height in both groups (zirconia and SSCs) for 6 months.
Conclusion:
Zirconia crowns presented to be an excellent choice for primary posterior teeth full coverage restorations. Zirconia crowns performed better than SSCs in the aspect of gingival response and prevention of plaque adhesion.
Keywords: zirconia crowns, stainless steel crown, primary molars, esthetics, dental caries.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Dean JA, Avery DR, McDonald RE. Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. Boston:vMosby; 2011
Connell AC, Kratunova E, Leith R. Posterior preveneered stainless steel crowns: clinical performance after three years. Pediatric dentistry. 2014 Jun 15;36(3):254-8.
Hutcheson C, Seale NS, McWhorter A, Kerins C, Wright J. Multi-surface composite vs stainless steel crown restorations after mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatric dentistry. 2012 Dec 14;34(7):460-7.
Qualtrough AJ, Piddock V. Ceramics update. J Dent 1997; 25: 91- 5.
Strub JR, Beschnidt SM. Fracture strength of 5 different allceramic crown systems. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 602-9.
McLean JW. Evolution of dental ceramics in the twentieth century. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 61-6.
Pani SC, Saffan AA, AlHobail S, Bin Salem F, AlFuraih A, AlTamimi M. Esthetic concerns and acceptability of treatment modalities in primary teeth: a comparison between children and their parents. International journal of dentistry. 2016 Jun 29;2016.
Fishman R, Guelmann M, Bimstein E. Children's selection of posterior restorative materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007 Sep 1;31(1):1-4.
Atieh M. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: A 2-year randomized clinical trial. Ped Dent. 2008;18: 325-32.
Holsinger DM, Wells MH, Scarbecz M, Donaldson M. Clinical evaluation and parental satisfaction with pediatric zirconia anterior crowns. Pediatr dent. 2016 Jun 15;38(3):192-7.
Salami A, Walia T, Bashiri R. Comparison of parental satisfaction with three tooth- colored full-coronal restorations in primary maxillary incisors. J Clin Pediat Dent. 2015 Sep;39(5):423-8.
Taran PK, Kaya MS. A comparison of periodontal health in primary molars restored with prefabricated stainless steel and zirconia crowns. Pediatric Dentistry. 2018 Sep 15;40(5):334- 9.
Mathew MG, Samuel SR, Soni AJ, Roopa KB. Evaluation of adhesion of Streptococcus mutans, plaque accumulation on zirconia and stainless steel crowns, and surrounding gingival inflammation in primary molars: Randomized controlled trial. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2020 Jan 18:1-6.
Murali G, Jayanthi Mungara D, Venumbaka NR, kumar Kothimbakkam SS, AKR SP. Parental satisfaction with pediatric posterior preformed zirconia and stainless steel crowns-a comparative study.
MacLean JK, Champagne CE, Waggoner WF, Ditmyer MM, Casamassimo P. Clinical outcomes for primary anterior teeth treated with preveneered stainless steel crowns. Pediatr dent. 2007 Sep 1;29(5):377-81.
Abuelniel G, Eltawil S. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Stainless Steel versus Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars: Randomized Controlled Trial. Egyptian Dental Journal. 2018 Apr 1;64(2-April (Orthodontics, Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry)):977-89.
Walia T, Salami AA, Bashiri R, Hamoodi OM, Rashid F. A randomisedcontrolled trial of three aesthetic full-coronal restorations in primary maxillary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2014 Jun 1;15(2):113-8.
Raslan N, Maroof H&Nourallah A. Comparison between conventional and nanocomposite veneered stainless steel crowns: pilot study. IAJD.2016 ;5 (3):109-16.
Fuks AB, Ram D, Eidelman E. Clinical performance of esthetic posterior crowns in primary molars: a pilot study. Pediatr dent. 1999;21(7):445-8.
Sharaf A & Farsi M. A clinical and radiographic evaluation of stainless-steel crowns for primary molars. J Dent.2004;32(1):27-33.
Padbury A, Eber R & Wang H. Interactions between the gingiva and the margin of restorations. J ClinPeriodontol. 2003; 30:379-85.
American Academy of Periodontology, Periodontal diseases of children and adolescents. Journal of Periodontology.1996; 67:57-62.
Elqousy A, ElmasryE&AboElnile G. Aclinical and radiographic evaluation of stainless-steel crown in second mandibular primary molars. Abstract of Master Thesis, Cairo University 2012.
Donly KJ, Sasa I, Contreras CI, Mendez MJ. Prospective randomized clinical trial of primary molar crowns: 24-month results. Pediatric Dentistry. 2018 Jul 15;40(4):253-8.
Mathew MG, Samuel SR, Soni AJ, Roopa KB. Evaluation of adhesion of Streptococcus mutans, plaque accumulation on zirconia and stainless steel crowns, and surrounding gingival inflammation in primary molars: Randomized controlled trial. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2020 Jan 18:1-6.