Evaluation of the remineralizing efficacy of GC Tooth Mousse Plus and Enafix using surface microhardness and surface roughness analysis in deciduous molars: an in vitro study Original Research

Main Article Content

Tatiya Neeti
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0099-8064
Jayatri Mondal
Syeda Sara Samreen
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4198-0426

Abstract

Aim: To compare and evaluate using surface microhardness measurement, and surface roughness analysis in deciduous molars using GC Tooth Mousse Plus and Enafix.


Material and methodology: A four-equal window acid resistant varnish was placed around the exposed enamel surface of forty removed deciduous molars before they were submerged in a demineralizing solution and remineralized for weeks using Tooth Mousse Plus and Enafix.


Statistical Analysis Used: One Way ANOVA and Post Hoc Turkey test (P<0.05) were used


Results: Following 4 weeks of remineralization, all specimens underwent SEM analysis and revealed indications of thickening of their inter-rod material. Tooth Mousse Plus also revealed pronounced remineralization evidence. Enafix demonstrated greater resistance to breakdown during the last acid exposure. Surface micro hardness (SMH) and surface roughness (Ra) both showed comparable results, with a noticeable decrease in roughness values and an increase in microhardness values, while Enafix showed a greater source of remineralization and Tooth Mousse Plus showed a greater resistance to the final acid challenge.


Conclusion: Enafix has demonstrated superior resistance to the final acid trial, whereas superior remineralization property was seen in GC Tooth Mousse Plus.

Article Details

How to Cite
Neeti, T., Mondal, J., & Sara Samreen , S. (2023). Evaluation of the remineralizing efficacy of GC Tooth Mousse Plus and Enafix using surface microhardness and surface roughness analysis in deciduous molars: an in vitro study: Original Research. International Journal of Pedodontic Rehabilitation, 8(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.56501/intjpedorehab.v8i1.740
Section
Articles

References

Fejerskov O. Changing paradigms in concepts on dental caries: consequences for oral health care. Caries research 2004;38(3):182 91.

Goswami S. Remineralize early demineralized enamel structure. SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences. 2016 Oct 1;7(4):231-234.

Levine RS. Towards the chemotherapeutic treatment of dental caries: a review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 1980 Dec;73(12):876-881.

Longbottom C, Ekstrand K, Zero D, Kambara M. Novel preventive treatment options. InDetection, Assessment, Diagnosis and Monitoring of Caries 2009 ;(21): 156-163.

Silverstone LM. Structure of carious enamel, including the early lesion. Journal of Oral Science Review 1973;3:100-60.

Lata S, Varghese NO, Varughese JM. Remineralization potential of fluoride and amorphous calcium phosphate-casein phospho peptide on enamel lesions: An in vitro comparative evaluation. Journal of conservative dentistry: Journal of conservative dentistry 2010 Jan;13(1):42-46.

Gangrade A, Gade V, Patil S, Gade J, Chandhok D, Thakur D. In vitro evaluation of remineralization efficacy of different calcium-and fluoride-based delivery systems on artificially demineralized enamel surface. Journal of conservative dentistry 2018 Jul;19(4):328-331

Torres CR, Rosa PC, Ferreira NS, Borges AB. Effect of caries infiltration technique and fluoride therapy on microhardness of enamel carious lesions. Operative Dentistry 2012;37:363–369.

Reham M, Kamel MM. Changes in surface roughness of bleached enamel by using different remineralizing agents. Tanta Dental Journal 2018 Oct 1;13(4):179-186.

Pulido MT, Wefel JS, Hernandez MM, Denehy GE, Guzman-Armstrong S, Chalmers JM, Qian F. The inhibitory effect of MI paste, fluoride and a combination of both on the progression of artificial caries-like lesions in enamel. Operative dentistry. 2008 Sep;33(5):550-555.

Reynolds EC. Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions by casein phosphopeptide-stabilized calcium phosphate solutions. Journal of Dental Research. 1997 Sep;76(9):1587-1595.

Chapla H, Shah N, Shah RR. Comparative evaluation of efficacy of CPP-ACPF and Clinpro on enamel remineralization with the help of DIAGNOdent- An invitro study. International Journal of biomedical and Advanced research 2013;4(6):182-19.

Shetty S, Hegde MN, Bopanna TP. Enamel remineralization assessment after treatment with three different remineralizing agents using surface microhardness: An in vitro study. Journal of conservative dentistry 2014 Jan;17(1):49-52.

Yamazaki H, Litman A, Margolis HC. Effect of fluoride on artificial caries lesion progression and repair in human enamel: regulation of mineral deposition and dissolution under in vivo-like conditions. Archives of Oral Biology 2007;52:263– 266.

Kakkar S, Singh G, Tandon P, Nagar A, Singh A, Chandra S. Comparison of various white spot lesion preventing medicaments: An In Vitro study. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society 2018 Apr 1;52(2):94-99.

Lt Col Sonali Sharma, Mithra N. Hegde, Vandana Sadananda and Blessen Matthew. Evaluation of efficacy of different surface treatment protocols by laser fluorescence: an in vitro study. Journal of Dental and Oral Craniofacial Research 2017; 3(4): 2-5.

Tahmasbi S, Adhami M, Valian A, Hamedi R. Effect of Three Different Remineralizing Agents on White Spot Lesions; AnIn Vitro Comparative Study. Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran 2016 Jul15;28(3):98-103.

Thakur S, Devadiga D, Hedge N M. Comparative evaluation of the effect of various remineralizing agents on Bleached enamel surface: an In vitro study. Journal of Pharmaceutical and scientific innovation 2015; 4(6): 324-328.