Conservative Aesthetic Approach in Management of Anterior Spacing Using Bioclear Concept – A Case Series

Ummul Sahiba SN; Sree Gowri; MS Prathap; Harish Shetty; Shakkira Moosa Kutty

doi:10.56501/intjorofacres.v8i1.1074

Authors

Ummul Sahiba SN Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University) Mangalore-575018, Karnataka, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7969-2879
Sree Gowri Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University) Mangalore-575018, Karnataka, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4205-1784
MS Prathap Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University) Mangalore-575018, Karnataka, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2647-9553
Harish Shetty Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University) Mangalore-575018, Karnataka, India
Shakkira Moosa Kutty Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Yenepoya Dental College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University) Mangalore-575018, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56501/intjorofacres.v8i1.1074

Keywords:

Diastema, Bioclear matrix, Spacing, Black triangles, Aesthetics

Abstract

The hassle to reproduce proximal anatomic contour in a restoration is one of the most common challenges faced by the clinicians while managing anterior spacing. The presence of open gingival area or black triangle involving social six would further complicate the situation to be managed with a direct restoration, provided the clinician has a guide to precisely reproduce the anatomic surfaces. The use of Bioclear matrix system prevails as an ideal choice for the dentists to accomplish long lasting, stronger and aesthetically superior composite restorations. This case report aims to exhibit the benefits of using Bioclear matrix in the restorative management of anterior spacing and its role in achieving clinically and functionally superior restoration with suitable biological properties.

Publication Facts

This article

Author statements

Data availability

N/A

16%

External funding

No

32%

Competing interests

N/A

11%

This journal

Other journals

Articles accepted

38%

33%

Days to publication

53

145

Indexed in

GS

Editor & editorial board: profiles
Academic society: N/A
Publisher: MM Publications

References

Jones LA, Robinson MY. A case study: esthetic and biologic management of a diastema closure using porcelain bonded restorations for excellent and predictable results. J Cosm Dent. 2002;18(3):72-83.

Pollak M. Aesthetic diastema closure utilizing a novel matrix system. Oral Health. 2010;100(3):38-47.

Urkande NK, Mankar N, Nikhade PP, Chandak M, Ikhar A, Patel A. Anterior Matrix Systems for Composite Restorations: A Review. Cureus. 2023;15(4):e37145. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37145

Tziafas D. Composition and structure of cementum: Strategies for bonding. In: Dental Hard Tissues and Bonding. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2005. p. 177–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28559-8_8

Shenoy A, Shenoy N, Babannavar R. Periodontal considerations determining the design and location of margins in restorative dentistry. J Interdisc Dent. 2012;2(1):3-10. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5194.94184

Gomes IA, Mariz DC, Borges AH, Tonetto MR, Firoozmand LM, Kuga CM, et al. In vivo Evaluation of Proximal Resin Composite Restorations performed using Three Different Matrix Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16(8):643-7. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1735

de Oliveira JD, Storrer CM, Sousa AM, Lopes TR, de Sousa Vieira J, Deliberador TM. Papillary regeneration: anatomical aspects and treatment approaches. RSBO Revista Sul-Brasileira de Odontologia. 2012;9(4):448-56. https://doi.org/10.21726/rsbo.v9i4.1027

Clark D. Restoratively driven papilla regeneration: correcting the dreaded black triangle. Texas Dent J. 2008;125(11):1112-5.

Kim J, Clark DJ. Full-mouth black triangle treatment protocol. Dent Today. 2017; 36:72-7.

Erdemir U, Yucel T, Yildiz E. Treatment options, timing and sequencing: Direct-indirect restorative treatment. In: Esthetic and Functional Management of Diastema. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p.169–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24361-0_12

Selvig KA, Hals E. Periodontally diseased cementum studied by correlated microradiography, electron probe analysis and electron microscopy. J Periodont Res.1977;12:419-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1977.tb00137.x

Crawford AW, Sampson WJ, de Bruin HJ. Shallow fluorine depth profiles of cementum in periodontal disease - a pilot study. J Dent Res. 1983;62:806-810. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620070601

Forsberg A, Lagergren K, Lonnerblad T. Dental calculus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol.1960;13:1051-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(60)90317-0

Furseth R. A study of experimentally exposed and fluoride treated dental cementum in pigs. Acta Odontol Scand.1970; 28: 833-50. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357009028249

Bai J, Qin M, Zhao Y-M, Huang M-W, Ji A-P. Chemical removal of necrotic periodontal ligament on delayed replanted teeth by sodium hypochlorite: morphological analysis and microhardness indentation test of cementum. Int Endodont J.2016;49: 393-401. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12467

Marigo L, Nocca G, Fiorenzano G, Callà C, Castagnola R, Cordaro M, et al. Influences of different air-inhibition coatings on monomer release, microhardness, and color stability of two composite materials. BioMed Res Int. 2019; 2019: 424024. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4240264